Borrower record · Q2 2026
Chicago US Midco III
As filed by 2 BDCs · period end 30 June 2026NAICS 52 · Finance and Insurance1 name variant under review
Two lenders report $11.0m of Chicago US Midco III at Q2 2026, marked at par. One of them has stopped accruing interest on two positions.
- Filed fair value
- $11.0m
- 2 funded positions
- Reporting lenders
- 2
- across 4 filed positions
- Aggregate mark
- 100.2c
- covers 50% of positions with a filed cost
- Maturities to
- 2032
- one date, 1 November 2032
- Periods on record
- 3
- Q1 2026 → Q2 2026
How this total is counted
- Every figure above is the sum of 2 funded positions filed by 2 BDCs, each one cited below.
- Counted from the Q2 2026 filings imported for this build, the latest of them filed 20 August 2026. A schedule filed after that date is not in these figures and will appear when the property is rebuilt.
- 2 filed positions carry no positive fair value — unfunded or written off — and are outside every figure above.
- 1 filed name variant is under review against this borrower. Until it is resolved, anything filed under that name is counted nowhere on this page.
Pricing as filed
2 floating tranches · SOFR250bp on all 2 floating tranches — every filer reports the same spread.
Capital structure
First-Lien Senior Secured, on all 2 positions whose seniority a filer disclosed.
Rate structure
Floating, on all 2 positions whose interest type a filer disclosed.
Maturity profile
all 2 funded positions dated6.3 years to maturity, weighted by fair value across the 2 dated positions.
Filed over time
2 periods · aggregate onlyFiled fair value
Aggregate marknot to zero
Q1 2026, Q2 2026 — every filer reporting the borrower at each period, aggregated. No lender is separated out at any period.
Credit flags
Not in the filings
- Q4 2025 is on record but not drawn: a different set of lenders reported it, so the total is not comparable with the rest.
- No filed cost on 50% of positions, which the aggregate mark therefore excludes.
- No fair value on the non-accrual positions — one filer reports them, so the figure would be that filer's.
- No mark dispersion. Fewer than four filers disclosed a cost, so the distance between the highest and lowest mark would place each of them.
Sign up for free
Who holds it, and where they mark it.
2 lenders hold the same credit and mark it differently. Behind the gate, one row each — for this borrower and for every other one on this site, free and with no limit on how many you read.
- The spread between the highest and lowest lender mark
- Quarter-on-quarter movement across 3 periods
- Which lender is on non-accrual, and which are not
- The 10-Q or 10-K behind every row, by accession number
Every filing behind this page
2 filers · Q2 2026| Filer | CIK | Form | Period | Filed | Accession |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antares Strategic Credit Fund | 0001993402 | 10-Q | 2026-06-30 | 2026-08-13 | 0001193125-26-349216 |
| Nuveen Churchill Private Capital Income Fund | 0001911066 | 10-Q | 2026-06-30 | 2026-08-12 | 0001628280-26-055912 |
Related borrowers
Same lenders
Same sector